Main Street Plaza A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Only for American Mormons, July 2011

06.25.2011 · · Posted in Uncategorized

For years our family has received the Liahona instead of the Ensign. I used to work for Distribution Services which is where I discovered that the Ensign magazine is only published for English-speaking American/Canadian Latter-day Saints. While I knew that the Liahona served non-English LDS around the world, I discovered that an English version of the Liahona is what LDS in South Africa, Austrailia, Ireland, and the United Kingdom receive – not the Ensign.

For those who are unaware of the distinctions, the LDS Church publishes five official periodicals: The Church News, which is a weekly newspaper insert that is distributed as part of the Deseret News; the Ensign, which is meant for adult members of the Church; the New Era, which is meant for the young adult membership; the Friend which is for primary-age youth; and the Liahona, which, as I’ve mentioned, is the international publication. Only the Liahona is published in foreign languages. The Liahona itself is actually composed of articles from the EnsignNew Era, and Friend (the Friend section is actually detachable as its own mini-magazine, which I still think is kinda cool for kids). Because the Liahona does not carry every story from the other three magazines there are a number of articles and stories from those three that are only published for English-speaking North Americans.

I signed up only a few years ago for five years worth of Liahona, so I still receive the magazine.  (I figured why pay for three magazines, when I could get one that covered all the same bases?)  After all of the outcry over Bruce Porter’s anti-gay and anti-individual-empowerment article in the June 2011 issue of the Ensign, I was surprised to find that this article did not appear in the international magazine: I had to read it online. If I were a Latter-day Saint in Britain or Australia I would be completely unaware that such an article had been published. With the large number of correlation committees that each article must pass through in order to be published, the decision to not publish Porter’s article in the international Liahona was certainly a conscious one. I wondered what else might be targeted towards the American (and Canadian, I guess) Mormons? Thus I will, for each month, point out those articles that have been dropped from the international magazine.

These posts are pretty much just data for other people to use. I make no claims of what they are about or what they mean. Use them how you will.  I am extremely interested in what conclusions might be drawn from this distinction between the foreign and domestic attention of the LDS Church.

Only For American Mormons – July 2011

The following is a list of the articles that only appear in the English magazines that the LDS Church publishes for its American audience. Some of these are self-explanatory, of course (e.g., World Briefs).

Ensign Articles:
New Era Articles:
Friend Articles:

And, for completeness’s sake, here are the articles that are unique to the Liahona.  They are almost entirely letters to the magazine from LDS around the world, although there is a call for testimonies from “Modern-Day Pioneers” that I did not find in the other English-language magazines.

Liahona Articles:

I’ll try and get around to also posting the results from June, which is what I first posted over at /r/exmormon.

I’m also interested in any feedback anyone has about this sort of raw data dump type of post. I personally enjoy this sort of analysis, but I understand if this is rather boring to others.

Views: 1122

2 Responses to “Only for American Mormons, July 2011”

  1. 1
    Chino Blanco says:

    The Church of Jesus Christ of the Middle Initial is no friend to trees.

    Edit: Wow, that was grumpy of me. Sorry! I guess my first question would be whether there’s a consistent pattern of difference between the Liahona and other TSCC publications regarding certain issues? For example, was Porter’s the first anti-LGBT Ensign article that wound up not being reprinted?

       0 likes

  2. 2
    chanson says:

    Thanks NoCoolName_Tom! It will be especially interesting to see patterns emerge as over time.

       0 likes

Leave a Reply