<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interesting Encounter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/</link>
	<description>A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-76335</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-76335</guid>
		<description>My family was and still is predominately Italian Catholic.  My cousin married  (20 year ago) her husband who is Jewish  At St Anne Roman Catholic Church which is located on long Island.    I think it definitely depends on the Parrish and how conservative or progressive it is.   It was not difficult at all and his family was accepting of my Aunts&#039; and Uncles&#039; and vice versa.

I currently have a friend who is married to a non-member and again it is a non-issue.   Maybe  because religion is not the main focus of their relationship.  They have many interest that they enjoy together as a couple.  They also have many things they enjoy doing separately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My family was and still is predominately Italian Catholic.  My cousin married  (20 year ago) her husband who is Jewish  At St Anne Roman Catholic Church which is located on long Island.    I think it definitely depends on the Parrish and how conservative or progressive it is.   It was not difficult at all and his family was accepting of my Aunts&#8217; and Uncles&#8217; and vice versa.</p>
<p>I currently have a friend who is married to a non-member and again it is a non-issue.   Maybe  because religion is not the main focus of their relationship.  They have many interest that they enjoy together as a couple.  They also have many things they enjoy doing separately.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',76335)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-76335">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday in Outer Blogness: Ideas and Discussions Edition! &#124; Main Street Plaza</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72718</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday in Outer Blogness: Ideas and Discussions Edition! &#124; Main Street Plaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72718</guid>
		<description>[...] to the connections among us! Madame Curie, building on Cr@ig&#8217;s discussion of inter-faith marriage, adds a number of interesting examples to discuss. The Urban Koda is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the connections among us! Madame Curie, building on Cr@ig&#8217;s discussion of inter-faith marriage, adds a number of interesting examples to discuss. The Urban Koda is [...]
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72718)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72718">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72598</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72598</guid>
		<description>Face-palm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face-palm.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72598)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72598">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Jack Meyers</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72592</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Jack Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72592</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It would not surprise me however, if popular Mormon culture reductionistically equates “Celestial Marriage” with the Celestial Glory.&lt;/em&gt;

They do. Speak of the devil, someone just left &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feministmormonhousewives.org/?p=2881#comment-819364&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a comment&lt;/a&gt; at fMh today saying: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;As a primary teacher I tell my boys, last year 11 yr olds, this year 9, you can not make it to the Celestial kingdom alone. I look at john and say you will not make it there without your wife, girls you will not make it without your husbands. You need a righteous loving marriage sealed in the temple to make it and that will not happen if you do not show anything short of total respect and love.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So much for having correlated manuals to ensure correct doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It would not surprise me however, if popular Mormon culture reductionistically equates “Celestial Marriage” with the Celestial Glory.</em></p>
<p>They do. Speak of the devil, someone just left <a href="http://www.feministmormonhousewives.org/?p=2881#comment-819364" rel="nofollow">a comment</a> at fMh today saying: </p>
<blockquote><p>As a primary teacher I tell my boys, last year 11 yr olds, this year 9, you can not make it to the Celestial kingdom alone. I look at john and say you will not make it there without your wife, girls you will not make it without your husbands. You need a righteous loving marriage sealed in the temple to make it and that will not happen if you do not show anything short of total respect and love.</p></blockquote>
<p>So much for having correlated manuals to ensure correct doctrine.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72592)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72592">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72591</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72591</guid>
		<description>My understanding was that there are degrees of the Celestial Kingdom, and to achieve the highest, you have to be married. But not for the lower levels.

It would not surprise me however, if popular Mormon culture reductionistically equates &quot;Celestial Marriage&quot; with the Celestial Glory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding was that there are degrees of the Celestial Kingdom, and to achieve the highest, you have to be married. But not for the lower levels.</p>
<p>It would not surprise me however, if popular Mormon culture reductionistically equates &#8220;Celestial Marriage&#8221; with the Celestial Glory.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72591)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72591">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuri</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72590</link>
		<dc:creator>kuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72590</guid>
		<description>On the Celestial Kingdom thing, like Holly, I&#039;ve heard it said or implied many times that people who aren&#039;t married in the temple can&#039;t go to the Celestial Kingdom. However, I think that&#039;s a mistaken view of Mormon doctrine.

D&amp;C 131:1-4 says that 1) there are three degrees of glory in the Celestial Kingdom, 2) to gain the highest, one must enter into the &quot;new and everlasting covenant of marriage&quot; (now interpreted as temple marriage), and one who does not enter that covenant can enter the Celestial Kingdom but cannot obtain the highest level.

So that&#039;s the official teaching, although I think there are many members who don&#039;t seem to know that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Celestial Kingdom thing, like Holly, I&#8217;ve heard it said or implied many times that people who aren&#8217;t married in the temple can&#8217;t go to the Celestial Kingdom. However, I think that&#8217;s a mistaken view of Mormon doctrine.</p>
<p>D&amp;C 131:1-4 says that 1) there are three degrees of glory in the Celestial Kingdom, 2) to gain the highest, one must enter into the &#8220;new and everlasting covenant of marriage&#8221; (now interpreted as temple marriage), and one who does not enter that covenant can enter the Celestial Kingdom but cannot obtain the highest level.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s the official teaching, although I think there are many members who don&#8217;t seem to know that.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72590)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72590">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72585</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72585</guid>
		<description>Alan, I think that&#039;s what you get when you try to be inclusive as a bit of an afterthought on a comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, I think that&#8217;s what you get when you try to be inclusive as a bit of an afterthought on a comment.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72585)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72585">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Jack Meyers</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72584</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Jack Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72584</guid>
		<description>#31 &lt;strong&gt;Holly&lt;/strong&gt; ~ I&#039;ve heard that, too, and culturally there seems to be a strong belief to that end, but I&#039;ve had LDS friends argue pretty convincingly that the only thing that&#039;s required for entrance to the celestial kingdom is the basic four (faith, repentance, baptism, gift of the Holy Spirit). I seem to recall that their sources were good, though I&#039;m too lazy to try to look it up right now. 

In any case, it&#039;s what my own husband believes. I was sort of answering the question in accordance with his beliefs on the matter. 

#65 &lt;strong&gt;Alan&lt;/strong&gt; ~ I noticed that too. I just assumed Seth meant &quot;spouses&quot; for his first mention of &quot;wives&quot; and let it go, though I don&#039;t blame you for poking fun at it. 

On an interesting note along those lines though, my own experience says that the male partner is a lot more likely to lose faith in the church than the female partner. I know quite a few couples where the man has stopped believing in the church and the woman is still TBM. I&#039;ve known couples where the woman stopped believing in the church and the husband eventually followed suit. I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ve ever known a couple where the woman stopped believing and the husband stayed TBM. (Not saying that it hasn&#039;t happened...) Subsequently, most of the people making spouse-complaints on post-LDS venues are men complaining about their TBM wives. 

I&#039;ve long observed that men generally seem to be more interested in discussing theology, doctrine and apologetics than women. I&#039;d chalk it up to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#31 <strong>Holly</strong> ~ I&#8217;ve heard that, too, and culturally there seems to be a strong belief to that end, but I&#8217;ve had LDS friends argue pretty convincingly that the only thing that&#8217;s required for entrance to the celestial kingdom is the basic four (faith, repentance, baptism, gift of the Holy Spirit). I seem to recall that their sources were good, though I&#8217;m too lazy to try to look it up right now. </p>
<p>In any case, it&#8217;s what my own husband believes. I was sort of answering the question in accordance with his beliefs on the matter. </p>
<p>#65 <strong>Alan</strong> ~ I noticed that too. I just assumed Seth meant &#8220;spouses&#8221; for his first mention of &#8220;wives&#8221; and let it go, though I don&#8217;t blame you for poking fun at it. </p>
<p>On an interesting note along those lines though, my own experience says that the male partner is a lot more likely to lose faith in the church than the female partner. I know quite a few couples where the man has stopped believing in the church and the woman is still TBM. I&#8217;ve known couples where the woman stopped believing in the church and the husband eventually followed suit. I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever known a couple where the woman stopped believing and the husband stayed TBM. (Not saying that it hasn&#8217;t happened&#8230;) Subsequently, most of the people making spouse-complaints on post-LDS venues are men complaining about their TBM wives. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve long observed that men generally seem to be more interested in discussing theology, doctrine and apologetics than women. I&#8217;d chalk it up to that.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72584)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72584">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Williams</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72581</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72581</guid>
		<description>I brought up the same-sex quip because of what Seth said @9:  

&lt;i&gt;If anyone talked about my wife that way in front of me, I’d punch them in the face. I can only feel sick pity for the women married to such worthless excuses for husbands and wives.&lt;/i&gt;

His tag-on &quot;and wives&quot; made me imagine a lesbian couple, a woman and her wife, and how nonsensical this is in the context of TBMness.  

&lt;b&gt;Lesbian&lt;/b&gt;:  &quot;Don&#039;t talk about my wife that way!&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Disrespectful Ex-Mormon&lt;/b&gt;:  &quot;Your &lt;i&gt;wife&lt;/i&gt;?  How can she be your wife if she&#039;s a TBM?  I&#039;m confused.&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Lesbian&lt;/b&gt;:  &quot;Oh that&#039;s it!  I&#039;ve had it with you!&quot;  *punches the ex-Mormon in the face*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I brought up the same-sex quip because of what Seth said @9:  </p>
<p><i>If anyone talked about my wife that way in front of me, I’d punch them in the face. I can only feel sick pity for the women married to such worthless excuses for husbands and wives.</i></p>
<p>His tag-on &#8220;and wives&#8221; made me imagine a lesbian couple, a woman and her wife, and how nonsensical this is in the context of TBMness.  </p>
<p><b>Lesbian</b>:  &#8220;Don&#8217;t talk about my wife that way!&#8221;<br />
<b>Disrespectful Ex-Mormon</b>:  &#8220;Your <i>wife</i>?  How can she be your wife if she&#8217;s a TBM?  I&#8217;m confused.&#8221;<br />
<b>Lesbian</b>:  &#8220;Oh that&#8217;s it!  I&#8217;ve had it with you!&#8221;  *punches the ex-Mormon in the face*
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72581)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72581">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2010/01/07/an-interesting-encounter/comment-page-2/#comment-72568</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=1366#comment-72568</guid>
		<description>Have a wonderful evening Holly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a wonderful evening Holly.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',72568)" src="http://latterdaymainstreet.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-72568">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: latterdaymainstreet.com @ 2012-05-24 08:45:43 -->
