Comments on: Sunday in Outer Blogness: Worthiness Edition! http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2009/06/14/sunday-in-outer-blogness-worthiness-edition/ A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism. Thu, 24 May 2012 00:02:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Main Street Plaza » Sunday in Outer Blogness: follow-up discussion edition! http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2009/06/14/sunday-in-outer-blogness-worthiness-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-77175 Main Street Plaza » Sunday in Outer Blogness: follow-up discussion edition! Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:32:35 +0000 http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=611#comment-77175 [...] still not totally sure whether it is satire or not), making Chris Smith’s court case satire (from many moons ago) look crystal clear by comparison. And, in the spirit of Sideon’s taking [...] [...] still not totally sure whether it is satire or not), making Chris Smith’s court case satire (from many moons ago) look crystal clear by comparison. And, in the spirit of Sideon’s taking [...]

   0 likes

]]> By: chanson http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2009/06/14/sunday-in-outer-blogness-worthiness-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-70165 chanson Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:09:18 +0000 http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=611#comment-70165 Actually, I thought it was kind of an interesting parallel -- who can legally use the word "Christian" vs. who can legally use the word "married". Apparently that was all that was decided by proposition 8: the right to use the word marriage on a legal contract. Actually, I thought it was kind of an interesting parallel — who can legally use the word “Christian” vs. who can legally use the word “married”. Apparently that was all that was decided by proposition 8: the right to use the word marriage on a legal contract.

   0 likes

]]> By: Christopher Smith http://latterdaymainstreet.com/2009/06/14/sunday-in-outer-blogness-worthiness-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-70160 Christopher Smith Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:18:10 +0000 http://latterdaymainstreet.com/?p=611#comment-70160 <i>>>the report turned out to be a very, very subtle satire.</i> Ha! It's ok, Carol, you can call it "bad" satire and I won't take offense. ;) Some very interesting posts here. Thanks for a great roundup, as always! >>the report turned out to be a very, very subtle satire.

Ha! It’s ok, Carol, you can call it “bad” satire and I won’t take offense. ;)

Some very interesting posts here. Thanks for a great roundup, as always!

   0 likes

]]>